Prince Dumisa - The Official Website

THE WAY FORWARD FOR SWAZILAND


PART III

 

Suddenly, the shocking and dramatic events of the past week on the world stage, the murder of Ken Saro-Wiwa and eight other environmental protectors in Nigeria, hastens the paste and significance of our thesis, namely, the need for good government. For while it is now internationally accepted that in the person of General Sami Abacha, Nigeria has produced Idi Amin Mark II, it is equally true that these things do not just happen out of the blue. They take time to fester and grow out of the chaotic environment of bad government and the corruption of public office by a significant few at the expense of the nation.

 

We shudder to think what would have happened to little Swaziland had Mfanasibili and his “Gang of Four” succeeded in selling the country to a Nigerian hustler, one Mr. Fernandez who already boasted a Swazi Royal Police security guard reserved for a Head of State together with a government country guest house, a Swazi diplomatic international passport, a fleet of government cars, and what else? Meanwhile top police and army officers, together with senior government ministers who refused to support them were languishing in condemned cells at Matsapa Central Prison crying for help. Just like that? Just like that. Mass graves were the next step in to the fall to the abyss. That is how fast and frightening to every thinking Swazi.

 

So we are not just talking to while away time. This is very serious business, it is your future, the future of your children and, indeed, the future of Africa and world government. We must forever remain committed and vigilant. And nobody can accuse us of having lacked or relaxed in that duty. We warned King Sobhuza this would happen. We protested against Mfanasibili and the Liqoqo (“The Frog”); we protested against the expulsion of Sotja Dlamini, Malchosonble Dlamini; and three other police officers fired by Mfanasibili; we protested against the expulsion and detention without trial (false imprisonment) of Titus Msibi (former Commissioner of Police), Edgar Hillary (then Deputy Commissioner), Simon Nxumalo (then Finance Minister), Arthur Khoza, and others, as mentioned earlier.

 

The painful lesson we learn from these former detainees, including the case of Dambuza Dlamini, is that it is almost impossible to reform the system “from within” unless you are at the very top vis-à-vis the King.’ E .g., It is a paradox that Mswati III who saved the Nation from Mfanasibili and Liqoqo chaotic quagmire is now himself a prisoner of the same system, unless pushed by national and international events. Nationally, the only people to rescue the King from the clutches of the clique (the benefiting few who have turned the King into their own “Mdumbadunbane”) are the Swazis themselves, the collective will of the people.

 

But while that remains true, as the King correctly told reporters when he visited South Africa in August , we must point out that the Swazi people shall only do that in a climate of free expression and political organization without intimidation. The simplest way to do that for King Mswati is to reinstate the Swaziland constitution of 1968, otherwise known as the Independence Constitution. That would immediately legalise political parties in the country, reinstate freedom of expression, association, assembly, etc., otherwise known as the Bill of Human Rights.

 

The constitution was hammered out in a period of seven years (1961-68) and contains ideas of the best brains in the business, from Professor Cowen of the University of Cape Town to the expertise and experience of the then British Administration. All we need to do now is update it to meet today’s and tomorrow’s needs. E.g. To avoid another self appointed Liqoqo hiding behind the King’s blanket, the constitution must make it categorically clear that in the event of the death of Head of State and/or the King, the popularly elected government, in Parliament, shall remain in office until the next general elections, while allowing for the period of debate about succession to the Swazi Crown to take place without panic nor violence.

 

In any modern democracy, the idea that the country should remain completely paranoid while the likes of Mfanasibili fight out in the dark corridors and stomach-saving intrigues of the palace is as nonsensical as it is dangerous. Business and industry cannot operate in a climate of uncertainty. The House of Assembly, together with the Senate and the Collegiate of Traditional Chiefs, would have to sign Bills on behalf of the Queen Regent during this period. (Swazi tradition dictates that every clan select their own chief or successor, so that royal princes and princesses would take or leave for that purpose).

 

Other areas that need urgent constitutional updates are those involving minerals and the land question vis-à-vis the Tibiyo Taka Ngwane National Fund. Which areas of minerals, land, and national projects generally fall within the government treasury in Mbabane and which ones fall within Tibiyo.

 

We shall recall that the Tibiyo Taka Ngwane fund was established just before independence by King Sobhuza II helped by Simon Nxumalo and other legal and financial experts. The idea was to protect the King, in trust for the Swazi Nation, against mineral exploiters and the British Administration through mineral royalties. As its name suggests, it is a Swazi National Public Fund whose audited accounts must be published and displayed at the Swazi National Offices at Lobamba and the Treasury at Mbabane for public scrutiny.

 

The same applies to the Tisuka TakaNgwane Fund, its brain child. These funds were certainly not set up as private in-pocket expenses for the King in his private capacity, and to run as he wished through his cronies and friends like Ndumiso Mamba, with no public accounting. This immediately raises the question of the King’s salary and these expenses of running the royal households. These are urgent serious matters we are talking about which need be addressed by the updated national constitution. Hospitals in the land have fallen to bits with neither drugs nor blankets, there is urgent need for modernizing and building new schools, the central government is running on a deficit, all this while national funds are squandered through waste, mismanagement and theft by the King’s cronies and “friends.” This cannot be allowed to go on; the outside world shall help us if we are seen to help ourselves. The King must think hard before he adds another to his seven wives, how is he going to maintain them and their children.

 

We know that King Sobhuza left many orphans with neither means of support nor livelihood. The myth that this “Swazi tradition” is nonsense with no place in today’s world of limited resources. For a start, Sobhuza was the first King ever to amass about 60 wives, even in the olden days of plenty. The Reed Dance is not there so that the King can select new wives every year. It is a national duty like any for the young Swazi men and women. Let it not be misused.

 

The stakes are very high indeed. The very dangerous and poisonous idea expressed by Vusi Sibisi of the Swazi Observer that all those who oppose the government and demonstrated against Mswati III in London in May this year are “enemies” is so narrow and shallow that it should be relegated to the King’s Praise Singers’ chapter.

 

To be continued ………..

 

 

Clement Dumisa Dlamini

For and on behalf of

The Human Rights Defence Fund

London

 

17th November 1995



The Way Forward For Swaziland Part IV